fzmax
Well-Known Member
For about a year I had a 2009 and a 1998. In that time I put about 5000 miles on the 2009 and about double that on the 1998. The fact was when I wanted to go for a ride, I chose to take the 98 more often than not. While all the praise about the second generation is positively true (stops, turns and accelerates better), the second generation misses the mark on the sound, style and range.
The other consideration is that even though the new bike does perform better then the original, the handling and braking aren't even on the same planet as any current standard or naked bike let alone a true performance machine. The acceleration on the other hand is truly awe inspiring.
Bottom line is that if you're looking for a ride to go short distances or take to the drag strip, you can't beat a second generation. But for sheer riding enjoyment, I'll pick the original any day.
The other consideration is that even though the new bike does perform better then the original, the handling and braking aren't even on the same planet as any current standard or naked bike let alone a true performance machine. The acceleration on the other hand is truly awe inspiring.
Bottom line is that if you're looking for a ride to go short distances or take to the drag strip, you can't beat a second generation. But for sheer riding enjoyment, I'll pick the original any day.
