Hello all...
Thought i'd get your opinions on this one.:ummm:
So I have a '94 with almost 14k miles on it. Bought it about a year ago for ~$4k with 8k miles on it. Have put about $500 into it between a brand new tire, rotor, pads, etc etc.
I have an option perhaps, coming up, to buy a 2003 with 2k miles on it. This one is listed a little over $4k (way below book i know).
Both look to have similar aftermarket stuff done, the simple stuff, exhaust, K&N, etc. Mine however has a corbin seat and thats all that really seems to differentiate. I just did tires and rotors on mine but a bike with 2k miles on it would have those parts be pretty new anyways.
Since i'm not necessarily rolling in the dough over here, I wanted your guys opinions if its worth it to try to sell mine (think i can get whats its worth to me? (~$4k-4500)) and then pick up the newer one?
Is there any huge advantages aside from the OEM parts being 10 years newer? Any big engineering gaps I should know about? I know i have to do a couple gaskets on my crankcase very soon, so i'm just wondering if that is a hint at more problems to come on mine. Or are these things are pretty sturdy and the money i'll waste re-registering/titling, paying tax, insurance, etc along with the headache of trying to sell a 94 bike in todays market:bang head: might indicate its a good idea to keep with the 94 and save for an 09:clapping: or newer.
Any thoughts would be great! Also I live outside of boston if that matters, if anyone knows about the ability to sell them up here.
thanks!
-garrett
Thought i'd get your opinions on this one.:ummm:
So I have a '94 with almost 14k miles on it. Bought it about a year ago for ~$4k with 8k miles on it. Have put about $500 into it between a brand new tire, rotor, pads, etc etc.
I have an option perhaps, coming up, to buy a 2003 with 2k miles on it. This one is listed a little over $4k (way below book i know).
Both look to have similar aftermarket stuff done, the simple stuff, exhaust, K&N, etc. Mine however has a corbin seat and thats all that really seems to differentiate. I just did tires and rotors on mine but a bike with 2k miles on it would have those parts be pretty new anyways.
Since i'm not necessarily rolling in the dough over here, I wanted your guys opinions if its worth it to try to sell mine (think i can get whats its worth to me? (~$4k-4500)) and then pick up the newer one?
Is there any huge advantages aside from the OEM parts being 10 years newer? Any big engineering gaps I should know about? I know i have to do a couple gaskets on my crankcase very soon, so i'm just wondering if that is a hint at more problems to come on mine. Or are these things are pretty sturdy and the money i'll waste re-registering/titling, paying tax, insurance, etc along with the headache of trying to sell a 94 bike in todays market:bang head: might indicate its a good idea to keep with the 94 and save for an 09:clapping: or newer.
Any thoughts would be great! Also I live outside of boston if that matters, if anyone knows about the ability to sell them up here.
thanks!
-garrett