Recent content by bkuhr

True, you can set igntion cutout delay here, but you may also need a delay on the TCI OUTPUT to allow time enough for the clutch and shift actuators to do their jobs!

Although I have not played with the option yet, I think 1 of the 2 OUTPUT options of the ingitech software would do what you want. Screenshot attached, looks like 'special' would activate an output on both RPM+TPS, where a quick flip of throttle could be the shift activation trigger. The other...

GREAT JOB, and I have been waiting on confirmation that TPS is better than MAP. Pic of my TPS, not the safest application but able to be installed without carb removal. I have been riding both v80 and v88 for over a year like this...

Not quite. MAP is measuring the vacum in the manifold which is directly based on throttle plate angle and indirectly based on how well the engine is breathing. RPM is a better indicator of WHAT the engine is doing. For discussion I provide below my thoughts and reseaoning for going to the...

Gary, need to flip one of the diodes. As drawn if pin 4+ and 5- both relays would activate.

Normal venture does not have boost, and I am unfamiular with it, but Gary, I beleive, was adding boost, we had talked about how to have the advance map trigger the boost using the servo output. I think Gary has a plan for that. I think we found a way to use % boost rather than just full on or...

NO, I am not the guy with the single input problem (91VR), but I did offer Gary some suggestions to offer that guy to resolve the problem. Not sure to date, but Gary thinks his problem was blocking inputs 1&2 options were set wrong. I AM the guy who has installed an actual TPS (83VR). Garys...

Hey, I am the 'venture guy' Gary sent over. I happen to agree with RempageR1, in that a true TPS is bettter than the MAP sensor. I have operated v80 and v88 with both TPS and MAP. The hardest part in a TPS setup is actually interfacing with the throttle controls somehow. I have a rig, and built...