So here's a theory on "warming up" an engine:
I think we can all agree that the vast majority of any engine's wear occurs at startup. Why? Because, at startup, engines operate momentarily with low or no oil pressure. In reality, once engines are running, the metal surfaces do not contact one another. If they did, the parts would last about 10 minutes. They are seperated by a layer of oil molecules as soon as the engine has been running for a few seconds.
With this in mind, I belive there is no harm in riding my bike under minimum load conditions soon after starting it. Yes, there are clearances that improve when the engine heats up. But putting down the street hardly puts any more stress on the crank/pistons than a fast idle in the driveway.
I've seen people run their bike for 10 minutes before putting it in gear. I suspect this just wastes gas and time.
Does anyone have evidence/argument for or against this theory?
I think we can all agree that the vast majority of any engine's wear occurs at startup. Why? Because, at startup, engines operate momentarily with low or no oil pressure. In reality, once engines are running, the metal surfaces do not contact one another. If they did, the parts would last about 10 minutes. They are seperated by a layer of oil molecules as soon as the engine has been running for a few seconds.
With this in mind, I belive there is no harm in riding my bike under minimum load conditions soon after starting it. Yes, there are clearances that improve when the engine heats up. But putting down the street hardly puts any more stress on the crank/pistons than a fast idle in the driveway.
I've seen people run their bike for 10 minutes before putting it in gear. I suspect this just wastes gas and time.
Does anyone have evidence/argument for or against this theory?