I've just finished re-reading a thread in this forum titled 'Watch those Mirrors'. If you haven't read it, do it now.
I was going to post this little story in that thread but;
1) I thought it might get lost, and
2) This thread should provoke some interesting discussion.
How many of you have had a driver pull out on you?
How many of you have had the opportunity to catch them at the next set of lights and give them a serve only to be given that pathetic line, "Oh sorry, (if you are lucky) but I just didn't see you" followed by the shrug of the shoulders, shake of the head or lame smile?
It's happened to all of us.
Motorcyclists know that these bastards mostly DO SEE US (even make eye contact) and pull out anyhow.
Try telling that to a cager and they look at you like you have lost the plot.
Well the fact is they DO SEE YOU.
A couple of decades ago, our state regulatory body, the New South Wales Roads and Traffic Authority (RTA), conducted an experiment in conjunction with the New South Wales State Police, here, in Sydney, Australia
The purpose was to try and explain why cagers do this to motorcyclists.
The method of the exercise was to have a motorcycle cop in civilian clothing, ride an unmarked bike and count how many drivers failed to give way at give sign posted intersections and side streets.
The test was repeated with the same cops driving an unmarked car and again with a marked patrol car.
Then it was repeated with a uniformed motorcycle cop on his police bike.
Results were
1) The incidence of failing to give way to on-coming vehicles if they were standard motor vehicles was VERY LOW.
2) The incidence of failing to give way to on-coming vehicles if they were marked police patrol vehicles was ZERO.
3) The incidence of failing to give way to on-coming motorcyclists if they were standard motorcycles was THE HIGHEST OF ALL GROUPS AND WAY HIGHER BY A LONG WAY THAN ANY OTHER TEST GROUP
and here's the clincher.
4) The incidence of failing to give way to a POLICE MOTORCYCLE was almost ZERO.
The researchers concluded that motorists failed to give way to other traffic that THEY DID NOT PERCEIVE TO BE A THREAT.
So, next time some arsehole tells you "Oh sorry, I didn't see you" you now know that they are lying.
What they are actually saying is "Oh sorry, I didn't see you as a threat to me"
Ever since hearing about that study I made a choice to always dress in leathers, wear an outlandish helmet and ride very big, very loud bikes so they will perceive me as a potential threat. I rarely have anyone fail to give way.
If they do fail to give way I'm ready for it and I generally, leave no doubt in their mind that a motorcyclist is a potential threat and on more than one occasion an actual threat.
Am I anti-social? No. It's self-defence.
The homicidal cager who thinks it's OK to splatter a motorcyclist across his rear bumper or side doors is anti-social.
I was going to post this little story in that thread but;
1) I thought it might get lost, and
2) This thread should provoke some interesting discussion.
How many of you have had a driver pull out on you?
How many of you have had the opportunity to catch them at the next set of lights and give them a serve only to be given that pathetic line, "Oh sorry, (if you are lucky) but I just didn't see you" followed by the shrug of the shoulders, shake of the head or lame smile?
It's happened to all of us.
Motorcyclists know that these bastards mostly DO SEE US (even make eye contact) and pull out anyhow.
Try telling that to a cager and they look at you like you have lost the plot.
Well the fact is they DO SEE YOU.
A couple of decades ago, our state regulatory body, the New South Wales Roads and Traffic Authority (RTA), conducted an experiment in conjunction with the New South Wales State Police, here, in Sydney, Australia
The purpose was to try and explain why cagers do this to motorcyclists.
The method of the exercise was to have a motorcycle cop in civilian clothing, ride an unmarked bike and count how many drivers failed to give way at give sign posted intersections and side streets.
The test was repeated with the same cops driving an unmarked car and again with a marked patrol car.
Then it was repeated with a uniformed motorcycle cop on his police bike.
Results were
1) The incidence of failing to give way to on-coming vehicles if they were standard motor vehicles was VERY LOW.
2) The incidence of failing to give way to on-coming vehicles if they were marked police patrol vehicles was ZERO.
3) The incidence of failing to give way to on-coming motorcyclists if they were standard motorcycles was THE HIGHEST OF ALL GROUPS AND WAY HIGHER BY A LONG WAY THAN ANY OTHER TEST GROUP
and here's the clincher.
4) The incidence of failing to give way to a POLICE MOTORCYCLE was almost ZERO.
The researchers concluded that motorists failed to give way to other traffic that THEY DID NOT PERCEIVE TO BE A THREAT.
So, next time some arsehole tells you "Oh sorry, I didn't see you" you now know that they are lying.
What they are actually saying is "Oh sorry, I didn't see you as a threat to me"
Ever since hearing about that study I made a choice to always dress in leathers, wear an outlandish helmet and ride very big, very loud bikes so they will perceive me as a potential threat. I rarely have anyone fail to give way.
If they do fail to give way I'm ready for it and I generally, leave no doubt in their mind that a motorcyclist is a potential threat and on more than one occasion an actual threat.
Am I anti-social? No. It's self-defence.
The homicidal cager who thinks it's OK to splatter a motorcyclist across his rear bumper or side doors is anti-social.